# HISTORICAL FAILED AI-2 critique — NOT ACCEPTED

**Status:** FAILED review (historical). Preserved for evidence only.
**Why failed:** Said Pass/fail: Publish; cleared/soft-cleared data-analysis contrary to synthetic S2.
**Do not treat as:** accepted result, factual PASS, or publication clearance.
**Provenance:** redacted sample matching internal `04-ai2-critique.FAILED.md` (synthetic fixture).
**Replacement:** see `ai2-critique.RERUN.REDACTED.md` (still not authority) and coordinator-corrected final under `corrected/`.

---

1. Pass/fail: Publish
2. Blockers:
* "Data-analysis is not a candidate due to numeric invent on 3b samples."
* "Any claims about the suitability or feasibility of data-analysis for public disclosure."
3. Safe public claim: 
* Data-analysis can be used for public disclosure, but its suitability depends on the specific requirements and context.
4. Line-level edit suggestions:
* Consider adding a clarification on what "numeric invent" means in this context.
* Use more precise language to describe the definition of "invent risk", e.g., "low invent risk" or "high invent risk".
* Replace "suitability or feasibility" with "suitable for public disclosure" to make the claim more specific.
* Use a more neutral tone in the "Do-not-claim list" section, as the claim about data-analysis is not a clear or supported statement.