# AI-2 critique RERUN (redacted sample) — NOT factual PASS

**Status:** MODEL_OUTPUT_RECEIVED / review still UNREVIEWED for authority.
**Context:** Re-run with sources + draft + restrictions in the prompt. Said Hold and confirmed Monitoring Untested / data-analysis NOT cleared, but residual source-attribution invent remains (see CONFLICTS.json C-2AI-002).
**Do not treat as:** human-approved final or factual PASS.
**Provenance:** redacted from internal repair `04-ai2-critique.md` (synthetic).

---

**Pass/fail for publish:** Hold

**Grounded in S1/S2:**

* Monitoring is a distribution candidate with low invent risk.
* Data-analysis is not a candidate due to numeric invent on 3b samples.

**Overclaims/Risks in AI-1 draft:**

* The definition of "invent risk" is unclear, which may lead to misinterpretation of the risks associated with data-analysis.
* The AI-1 draft claims that data-analysis is not a distribution candidate, but S1 notes that it is, which may be a misunderstanding.

**Safe public one-paragraph claim:**

* Data-analysis is not suitable for public disclosure due to numeric invent on 3b samples.

**Confidence:**

* Confidence: low (the definition of "invent risk" is unclear and may lead to misinterpretation of the risks associated with data-analysis)

**Explicit confirmations:**

* Monitoring Library status remains Untested (not Verified).
* data-analysis is NOT cleared for public use / not a distribution candidate.

**No public claim — Hold:**

* No clear definition or criteria provided for "invent risk" in the context of data-analysis.
* The claim about data-analysis being a distribution candidate is not supported by the sources.

**Safe public claim:**

* Data-analysis is not suitable for public disclosure due to numeric invent on 3b samples.

**Hold / do not publish:**