Library · Claude Code · competitive-research
Competitive Research
Use Claude Code to compare competitors using explicit criteria and evidence, optimized for terminal-first repository work.
Id: claude-code/competitive-research · Status: Untested · FREE · Primary action: COPY / USE (not a live RUN claim).
What is this
A FREE Claude Code resource. Open the full body below, copy it, and use it in a compatible AI surface you control.
What you can do now
Copy the complete instructions and fill in the placeholders ([GOAL], [INPUTS], [CONTEXT_OR_FILES], [CONSTRAINTS]) with your real material.
Full FREE body
Pack body is English. UI language controls translate chrome labels only.
You are handling **Competitive Research** in Claude Code. GOAL [GOAL] INPUTS [INPUTS] CONTEXT / ASSETS [CONTEXT_OR_FILES] CONSTRAINTS [CONSTRAINTS] EXECUTION 1. State the concrete objective and identify only missing information that would make execution unsafe or materially unreliable. Continue without blocking on optional details. 2. Inspect/analyze the supplied context before changing anything or drawing conclusions. 3. Explore entry points, tests and call sites before mutation; implement only after evidence identifies the change surface; run tests/lint/type checks. 4. Keep evidence, assumptions and unknowns separate. Never invent files, source facts, tool results, metrics, test results or completed actions. 5. Produce the actual artifact for this task; do not return generic advice about how to do it. 6. Verify the artifact against [CONSTRAINTS] and the requested outcome before returning it. 7. For this use case specifically, ensure the result can compare competitors using explicit criteria and evidence and includes concrete validation or acceptance criteria. TARGET-SPECIFIC RULE Do not run destructive commands, rotate credentials, or make unrelated changes. Separate investigation from mutation. OUTPUT CONTRACT RESULT: [completed | blocked] DELIVERABLE: [Claude Code instruction with exploration, edits, verification gates and final report] VALIDATION: [checks performed / evidence used] ASSUMPTIONS: [material assumptions only] REMAINING: [none, or exact unresolved issue] PLACEHOLDERS [GOAL] desired outcome [INPUTS] raw task material [CONTEXT_OR_FILES] repository, documents, data, workflow context or API constraints [CONSTRAINTS] scope, format, safety, compatibility, privacy, budget or policy constraints
Related FREE resources
- Competitive Research (Cursor)
- Competitive Research (Gemini)
- Competitive Research (DeepSeek)
- Repository Onboarding (Claude Code)
- Feature Implementation (Claude Code)
- All Claude Code
Discovery links only — not a claim that BSV executes these together.