Coding Review — CrewAI

Files

• crew_coding_review.py — CrewAI agents + tasks
• requirements-hint.txt — Suggested packages (pin yourself)

Full prompt / config / code

Copy

# crew_coding_review.py — Coding Review (CrewAI)
# Safety: local/OpenAI-compatible endpoint preferred. No keys in source.
# pip install crewai  (pin versions yourself)

from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew, Process

SYSTEM = """You are a code review specialist. Goal: find bugs and risks in the pasted diff/file.

RULES:
- Do not rewrite the whole codebase. Comment on the provided snippet only.
- Flag: correctness, security, missing tests, irreversible ops, secrets.
- Never suggest committing secrets, force-push, or rm -rf style cleanup.
- Propose patches as unified-diff style snippets when useful.
- Stop with a severity-ordered list. Human decides merges.

OUTPUT:
1) Summary (2-4 sentences)
2) Issues table: severity | location | issue | suggested fix
3) Tests to add
4) What looks fine"""

GOAL = "Review a diff or file for bugs, risky paths, and missing tests \u2014 without auto-committing or running destructive commands."

lead = Agent(
    role="Coding Review lead",
    goal=GOAL,
    backstory="Local BotShelf operator. One job, then stop. No spend. No destructive tools.",
    allow_delegation=False,
    verbose=False,
)

reviewer = Agent(
    role="Quality gate",
    goal="Check the lead output against the required sections; list gaps only.",
    backstory="Pedantic reviewer. Does not invent facts.",
    allow_delegation=False,
    verbose=False,
)

produce = Task(
    description=(
        "Follow SYSTEM strictly.\n\nSYSTEM:\n" + SYSTEM +
        "\n\nUSER INPUT:\n{user_input}"
    ),
    expected_output="Complete Coding Review structured result.",
    agent=lead,
)

gate = Task(
    description=(
        "Verify the previous result has all required sections. "
        "Return Pass/Fail + missing sections. Do not rewrite creatively."
    ),
    expected_output="Pass/Fail and gap list.",
    agent=reviewer,
)

crew = Crew(
    agents=[lead, reviewer],
    tasks=[produce, gate],
    process=Process.sequential,
)

def run(user_input: str) -> str:
    return str(crew.kickoff(inputs={"user_input": user_input}))

if __name__ == "__main__":
    print(run("PASTE_EXAMPLE_IN"))

Example in

Review this Python snippet:
```
def pay(user, amount):
    charge(user.card, amount)
    send_receipt(user.email)
```
Context: internal tool, no retries yet.

Example out

Summary: Charge-then-receipt with no idempotency or failure handling.
Issues:
- high | charge() | no idempotency key | add key + status check
- med | send_receipt | may fire after partial failure | gate on success
Tests: simulate charge timeout; duplicate submit.
Looks fine: clear happy-path shape.

Model / runtime notes

Two-agent crew (produce + gate). Keep tools disabled unless you add read-only tools on purpose.

Canonical Team

Parent: coding-review · implementation_id: crewai/coding-review

GitHub source

teams/coding-review/crewai · commit eb87e8e049fdf9908e438305ff827c7b617505b5 · license: free-use-at-own-risk

Structural check: PASS · env: structural (structural only — does not set Verified)

Related Library items

• ollama/coding-review
• lm-studio/coding-review
• open-webui/coding-review
• n8n/coding-review

Related marketplace Team pages

Soft thematic links only — not identity merges. Marketplace Teams ≠ Library AI Team records.

• Claude Review (marketplace Team page — separate entity)
• Claude PR (marketplace Team page — separate entity)