Library · Team · CrewAI · deep-research
Deep Research — CrewAI
Turn a fuzzy question into a sourced research brief with open questions and next checks — not a final verdict. (CrewAI multi-agent Python sketch for one job.)
Id: crewai/deep-research · Slug: deep-research · Status: Untested · Untested on this machine — recipe reviewed for safety (no secrets, no destructive commands, no auto-spend). Mark tested after you run it locally.
What is this
AI Team for CrewAI. Turn a fuzzy question into a sourced research brief with open questions and next checks — not a final verdict. (CrewAI multi-agent Python sketch for one job.)
How this runtime fits
This CrewAI sketch is a AI Team implementation typed as AI Team in the catalog. Where roles coordinate, it is fair to call it an agent team or multi-agent system — not a swarm.
Parent AI Team: deep-research · What is an AI Team?
What it does
Turn a fuzzy question into a sourced research brief with open questions and next checks — not a final verdict. (CrewAI multi-agent Python sketch for one job.)
Who for
Builders working on Research jobs who can run CrewAI themselves.
Works with
Need to run
- You will run this locally or on infra you control.
- No production credentials in prompts or committed files.
- Python 3.10+
- CrewAI in a venv
- Local or keyed LLM endpoint with budget awareness
How to use
- Create a venv; install CrewAI (pin versions yourself).
- Configure a local OpenAI-compatible base URL when possible.
- Save crew_deep_research.py and run: python crew_deep_research.py
- Replace PASTE_EXAMPLE_IN with your real input.
- Read Pass/Fail gate output before trusting the draft.
Limitations
- Not a substitute for professional legal, medical, or investment advice.
- Outputs can be wrong; human review required before publish or spend.
- Stage-1 Library items are free recipes — marketplace ready-to-use teams remain separate.
- Do not attach billing cloud LLM nodes without a human budget check.
Test status
Status: Untested · Untested on this machine — recipe reviewed for safety (no secrets, no destructive commands, no auto-spend). Mark tested after you run it locally.
Files
crew_deep_research.py— CrewAI agents + tasksrequirements-hint.txt— Suggested packages (pin yourself)
Full prompt / config / code
# crew_deep_research.py — Deep Research (CrewAI)
# Safety: local/OpenAI-compatible endpoint preferred. No keys in source.
# pip install crewai (pin versions yourself)
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew, Process
SYSTEM = """You are a careful research desk. Goal: produce a brief, not a verdict.
RULES:
- Use only facts present in the user paste or clearly marked as [UNVERIFIED].
- Separate: Known / Inferred / Unknown / Next checks.
- Cite sources as the user labeled them (URL, doc name, date). Do not invent citations.
- No spending, no shell commands, no credential requests.
- Stop after the brief. Ask one clarifying question only if blocking.
OUTPUT:
1) One-sentence scope
2) Findings (bullets)
3) Open questions
4) Next checks (max 5)
5) Confidence: low|medium|high + why"""
GOAL = "Turn a fuzzy question into a sourced research brief with open questions and next checks \u2014 not a final verdict."
lead = Agent(
role="Deep Research lead",
goal=GOAL,
backstory="Local BotShelf operator. One job, then stop. No spend. No destructive tools.",
allow_delegation=False,
verbose=False,
)
reviewer = Agent(
role="Quality gate",
goal="Check the lead output against the required sections; list gaps only.",
backstory="Pedantic reviewer. Does not invent facts.",
allow_delegation=False,
verbose=False,
)
produce = Task(
description=(
"Follow SYSTEM strictly.\n\nSYSTEM:\n" + SYSTEM +
"\n\nUSER INPUT:\n{user_input}"
),
expected_output="Complete Deep Research structured result.",
agent=lead,
)
gate = Task(
description=(
"Verify the previous result has all required sections. "
"Return Pass/Fail + missing sections. Do not rewrite creatively."
),
expected_output="Pass/Fail and gap list.",
agent=reviewer,
)
crew = Crew(
agents=[lead, reviewer],
tasks=[produce, gate],
process=Process.sequential,
)
def run(user_input: str) -> str:
return str(crew.kickoff(inputs={"user_input": user_input}))
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(run("PASTE_EXAMPLE_IN"))
Example in
Question: Why did our signup conversion drop last week? Sources: - [A] analytics export 2026-09-01..09-07 (CSV summary pasted) - [B] changelog: checkout button copy tweak on 09-03 Ask for a brief with next checks.
Example out
Scope: Explain likely drivers of signup conversion drop using only pasted analytics + changelog. Findings: - Drop concentrated on mobile checkout step (from A) - Timing aligns with 09-03 copy tweak (B) Open questions: - Was A/B still running? Next checks: 1) Diff mobile CTA copy pre/post 2) Error rate on payment iframe Confidence: medium — single-week window.
Model / runtime notes
Two-agent crew (produce + gate). Keep tools disabled unless you add read-only tools on purpose.
Canonical Team
Parent: deep-research
· implementation_id: crewai/deep-research
GitHub source
teams/deep-research/crewai · commit eb87e8e049fdf9908e438305ff827c7b617505b5
· license: free-use-at-own-risk
Structural check: PASS · env: structural (structural only — does not set Verified)
Related Library items
Related marketplace Team pages
Soft thematic links only — not identity merges. Marketplace Teams ≠ Library AI Team records.
- Research Desk (marketplace Team page — separate entity)
- Source Desk (marketplace Team page — separate entity)