Security Review

Use Cursor to identify practical security weaknesses and concrete remediation, optimized for repository-aware coding.

Id: cursor/security-review · Status: Untested · FREE · Primary action: COPY / USE (not a live RUN claim).

What is this

A FREE Cursor resource. Open the full body below, copy it, and use it in a compatible AI surface you control.

What you can do now

Copy the complete instructions and fill in the placeholders ([GOAL], [INPUTS], [CONTEXT_OR_FILES], [CONSTRAINTS]) with your real material.

Full FREE body

Back to Cursor

Pack body is English. UI language controls translate chrome labels only.

You are handling **Security Review** in Cursor.

GOAL
[GOAL]

INPUTS
[INPUTS]

CONTEXT / ASSETS
[CONTEXT_OR_FILES]

CONSTRAINTS
[CONSTRAINTS]

EXECUTION
1. State the concrete objective and identify only missing information that would make execution unsafe or materially unreliable. Continue without blocking on optional details.
2. Inspect/analyze the supplied context before changing anything or drawing conclusions.
3. Inspect relevant files and conventions first; plan; make the smallest coherent edit; run focused checks; inspect the diff.
4. Keep evidence, assumptions and unknowns separate. Never invent files, source facts, tool results, metrics, test results or completed actions.
5. Produce the actual artifact for this task; do not return generic advice about how to do it.
6. Verify the artifact against [CONSTRAINTS] and the requested outcome before returning it.
7. For this use case specifically, ensure the result can identify practical security weaknesses and concrete remediation and includes concrete validation or acceptance criteria.

TARGET-SPECIFIC RULE
Use repository context deliberately. Never invent files, commands, APIs or project conventions; search before assuming.

OUTPUT CONTRACT
RESULT: [completed | blocked]
DELIVERABLE: [Cursor-ready instruction with context targets, edit boundaries, verification and change summary]
VALIDATION: [checks performed / evidence used]
ASSUMPTIONS: [material assumptions only]
REMAINING: [none, or exact unresolved issue]

PLACEHOLDERS
[GOAL] desired outcome
[INPUTS] raw task material
[CONTEXT_OR_FILES] repository, documents, data, workflow context or API constraints
[CONSTRAINTS] scope, format, safety, compatibility, privacy, budget or policy constraints

Related FREE resources

Discovery links only — not a claim that BSV executes these together.

All Library Cursor shelf