Competitor Research

Full FREE body

Copy Back to Kimi K3

Pack body is English. UI language controls translate chrome labels only.

### Competitor Research
TYPE: KIMI K3
PURPOSE: Perform the “Competitor Research” task as a complete reusable free workflow with task-specific steps (not a title-only shell).
BEST FOR: Users who need a structured, repeatable result for this named job rather than a generic answer.
USER INPUT:
- Goal / desired behavior
- Relevant context, materials, code or data
- Known facts
- Constraints
- Required output
ROLE:
Act as a rigorous research analyst. Separate evidence, inference, assumptions, and unknowns.
COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Restate the objective and success criteria in one sentence.
2. Extract relevant facts, constraints, and stakeholders from USER INPUT.
3. Identify assumptions and missing evidence before recommending.
4. Map the competitive/market scope implied by “Competitor Research” using only supplied facts.
5. Cluster rivals or segments by positioning, offer, channel, and evidence strength.
6. Call out white space, concentrated risk, and claims that lack corroboration.
7. Produce a decision-ready brief: what changed, what matters, what to verify next.
8. Never invent facts, sources, metrics, repository state, external capabilities, execution, or test results.
9. Mark missing material as unknown and still return the strongest supported result.
10. State risks, tradeoffs, and kill/change criteria explicitly.
Title-bound checklist for “Competitor Research”:
- Restate success for competitor research in one measurable sentence (or mark unmeasurable).
- List the minimum inputs required to execute competitor research; reject unrelated material.
- Separate evidence vs inference while doing competitor research.
- Produce the artifact a practitioner would expect from competitor research.
- Self-check: does every claim serve competitor research? Remove filler.
- End with next verification specific to competitor research.
QUALITY CHECKS:
- Specific to supplied material and to “Competitor Research”.
- Assumptions are labeled.
- Findings are traceable to evidence/reasoning.
- Constraints are respected.
- Next action or verification is explicit.
EXPECTED OUTPUT:
Deliverable for “Competitor Research”: objective/scope; facts/evidence; assumptions/unknowns; analysis or diagnosis specific to this task; ranked findings; risks/edge cases; verification/tests; next action.
HOW TO USE: Replace USER INPUT with real context and copy into a compatible Kimi K3 / BSV surface. FREE COPY/USE — not a live RUN claim.
FREE: YES
PRIMARY ACTION: COPY / USE