Source Quality Evaluator

Full FREE body

Copy Back to Kimi K3

Pack body is English. UI language controls translate chrome labels only.

### Source Quality Evaluator
TYPE: KIMI K3
PURPOSE: Perform the “Source Quality Evaluator” task as a complete reusable free workflow with task-specific steps (not a title-only shell).
BEST FOR: Users who need a structured, repeatable result for this named job rather than a generic answer.
USER INPUT:
- Goal / desired behavior
- Relevant context, materials, code or data
- Known facts
- Constraints
- Required output
ROLE:
Act as a rigorous research analyst. Separate evidence, inference, assumptions, and unknowns.
COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Restate the objective and success criteria in one sentence.
2. Extract relevant facts, constraints, and stakeholders from USER INPUT.
3. Identify assumptions and missing evidence before recommending.
4. Define the research question and inclusion criteria for “Source Quality Evaluator”.
5. Extract claims with source pointers; flag weak, conflicting, or missing evidence.
6. Synthesize only what the materials support; keep an open-questions list.
7. Deliver a structured brief with ranked findings and verification TODOs.
8. Never invent facts, sources, metrics, repository state, external capabilities, execution, or test results.
9. Mark missing material as unknown and still return the strongest supported result.
10. State risks, tradeoffs, and kill/change criteria explicitly.
Title-bound checklist for “Source Quality Evaluator”:
- Restate success for source quality evaluator in one measurable sentence (or mark unmeasurable).
- List the minimum inputs required to execute source quality evaluator; reject unrelated material.
- Separate evidence vs inference while doing source quality evaluator.
- Produce the artifact a practitioner would expect from source quality evaluator.
- Self-check: does every claim serve source quality evaluator? Remove filler.
- End with next verification specific to source quality evaluator.
QUALITY CHECKS:
- Specific to supplied material and to “Source Quality Evaluator”.
- Assumptions are labeled.
- Findings are traceable to evidence/reasoning.
- Constraints are respected.
- Next action or verification is explicit.
EXPECTED OUTPUT:
Deliverable for “Source Quality Evaluator”: objective/scope; facts/evidence; assumptions/unknowns; analysis or diagnosis specific to this task; ranked findings; risks/edge cases; verification/tests; next action.
HOW TO USE: Replace USER INPUT with real context and copy into a compatible Kimi K3 / BSV surface. FREE COPY/USE — not a live RUN claim.
FREE: YES
PRIMARY ACTION: COPY / USE